Corporate law assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Corporate law - Assignment Example The constitution that governed the partnership changed and a fresh partnership was created between MGM and Pitgate. Mr. James still held a substantial share (49 percent) in their mining lease, which was still being used in the MGM and Pitgate partnership. The late Mr. James’ interest of the estate is represented by the Public Trustee since they had been appointed managers and receivers of the partnership between MGM and Mr. James and trustees of a numbers of the properties. Finally, Mr. and Mrs. Meyer directed MGM and were responds of the action. The legal issues to be determined with regards to the MDLA 415 were the entitlement of the assets benefits and whether this entitlement lies exclusively with Mr. Meyers. There were other issues such as the application for the license in paragraph 17 and also in paragraph 35 about the constructive trust, whether Mr. Meyer is entitled to the benefit of the license when the application was made by a reasonably rouge agent of the partnership and whether the entitlement is held on constructive trust. Also, in the first paragraph, we can see that major questions were asked as to whether or not certain plant and equipments were properties of the partnership and also whether Mr. Meyer was totally entitle to the benefit of the application for a Mineral Development License. It also wanted to establish whether the mining lease, though not officially held in the name of the partners, was the subject of the partnership activity. The respondent argued that no time did he ever treat Mr. James’ interest in the MDLA 295 as part of the partnership business and sought to explain why it was it was listed by him as an asset of the partnership in reference of correspondence to the applicants when asked to list partnership property upon the winding up of the partnership. The explanation given in paragraph 34 is that when he listed the asset, which had potential value to the Chillagoe Perlite partnership business venture as an

Descartes & Dostoevsky Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Descartes & Dostoevsky - Essay Example What they can assume to be reality may actually be a dream. There is a term to describe part of the confusion of determining whether an incident was a dream or reality, and this is called post-dreaming-doubt experience. A post-dreaming-doubt experience is when we experience doubts after having experienced something that may or may not have taken place while dreaming. The dreaming doubt argument leaves room to allow us to consider that what we experienced might have even taken place while we were wide awake. There is also the possibility that the experience took place while we were dreaming. The point is, we do not know and we cannot separate the two to fully understand them. Similarly, we can become befuddled by what took place while we were awake as there is the possibility that we could have actually been dreaming while the incident took place. Post-dreaming-doubt causes us to reconsider what we have seen or experienced and try to determine in which state it took place, during dreaming or while being awake. Attempting to distinguish between dream-experiences and waking-experiences becomes meaningless because we are unaware of during which state these experiences actually took place. What we believe took place in the waking world could have just as easily taken place in the dreaming world and vice versa. Since there is no surefire method or procedure to determine the state in which an experience took place, it becomes pointless to bother to try to figure it all out. The distinction also becomes useless since we are not sure what the distinctions are between the two. This causes us to call into question the states of dreaming and reality. Post-dreaming-doubt experiences is the perfect way to describe the doubt that comes with considering the differences between experiences that either took place while dreaming or being